FreeRTOS Support Archive
The FreeRTOS support forum is used to obtain active support directly from Real
Time Engineers Ltd. In return for using our top quality software and services for
free, we request you play fair and do your bit to help others too! Sign up
to receive notifications of new support topics then help where you can.
This is a read only archive of threads posted to the FreeRTOS support forum.
The archive is updated every week, so will not always contain the very latest posts.
Use these archive pages to search previous posts. Use the Live FreeRTOS Forum
link to reply to a post, or start a new support thread.
[FreeRTOS Home] [Live FreeRTOS Forum] [FAQ] [Archive Top] [September 2015 Threads]
Hi all,
I'm using ST's CubeMX implementation on a F4 discovery board. I use ST's USB middlewares with FreeRTOS.
When I get a special OutputReport from PC side I have to answer nearly immediately (in 10-15 ms). Currently I cannot achieve this timing and it seems my high priority tasks can interrupt the USB callback. What do you think, is it possible? Because it's generated code I'm not sure but can I increase the priority of the USB interrupt (if there is any)?
Thank you,
David
10 to 15 ms is very slow, so I'm sure its possible.
Where is the USB callback function called from? If it is an interrupt then it cannot be interrupted by high priority RTOS tasks. Any non interrupt code (whether you are using an RTOS or not) can only run if no interrupts are running.
Without knowing the control flow in your application its hard to know what to suggest. How is the OutputReport communicated to you? By an interrupt, a message from another task, or some other way?
The callback which receive the data from PC is called from the OTGFSIRQHandler (it's the part of the HALPCDIRQHandler function). I think the problem is SysTickHandler's priority is higher than OTGFSIRQHandler and it's cannot be modified, but the scheduler shouldn't interrupt the OTGFSIRQHandler with any task handled by the scheduler. Am I wrong that the scheduler can interrupt the OTGFS_IRQHandler?
One of the most striking aspects of Part 3 is its exploration of the psychological toll on Bani, as she navigates the treacherous landscape of her sasural (husband's family). The show's writers have taken a bold approach in depicting the emotional turmoil, highlighting the cracks in the seemingly traditional and conservative family structure.
"SASURAL ME BANI RANDI BAHU" Part 3 is a thought-provoking and intense addition to the series, plunging deeper into the complexities of human relationships and the consequences of patriarchy. While the show has courted controversy, it has also sparked essential conversations about consent, women's rights, and the social fabric of India.
Unsurprisingly, "SASURAL ME BANI RANDI BAHU" Part 3 has not been without its share of controversy and criticism. Some have accused the show of perpetuating negative stereotypes about women and reinforcing a narrative that is detrimental to Indian society. Others have praised the show for its bold storytelling and willingness to tackle taboo subjects.
In the vast and diverse landscape of Indian television, few shows have managed to capture the attention of audiences quite like "SASURAL ME BANI RANDI BAHU". The show, which translates to "The Daughter-in-Law Became a Prostitute in the Husband's Family", has sparked intense debate and discussion across the country. As we continue our critical analysis of this phenomenon, we delve deeper into the themes, implications, and controversies surrounding the show.
In the end, "SASURAL ME BANI RANDI BAHU" Part 3 serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of storytelling in shaping our understanding of the world. By exploring the complexities of human relationships and the consequences of patriarchy, the show offers a scathing critique of societal norms, forcing us to confront the harsh realities faced by women in India.
Thank you for the answer, I think I'm a bit confused with the Cortex ISR priorities :-)
What I can observe is if I use a much higher osDelay in my high priority task I can respond for the received USB message much faster. This is why I think tasks can mess up with my OTG interrupt.
Copyright (C) Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.